Returning to Whistler
In the preceding report, I talked about how DH was being taken up within STS (science and technology studies). This report reverses the relationship, and looks at what DH could learn from STS. I was invited to give the opening talk at the annual INKE (Implementing New Knowledge Environments) gathering, held on 19-20 January in Whistler, Canada. The key lessons from STS for DH are:
1.Technologies could have been otherwise (Bijker & Law, 1992) – in the past and in the future, with consequences for our methods and for our results.
2.New technologies and old social forms (Williams, 1990) – digital methods are taken up within traditional social forms such as universities and publishing.
3.Users matter (Oudshoorn & Pinch, 2003) – technologies continue to evolve in practices of use.
4.Artefacts have politics (Winner, 1980)/politics have artefacts (Joerges, 1992) – technologies are never neutral.
5.Radical reflexivity (Woolgar, 1988; Ashmore, 1989) – as a reminder to question what kind of knowledge we are producing, with or without digital methods, techniques and forms of representation.
The rest of the meeting was taken up with a series of excellent lightning talks on themes of open social scholarship, scholarly communication and production, new knowledge models, design, and the future of cultural institutions. Twenty-five short talks, plus a further twelve demos, so far too much to summarise here.
As usual, the organisers will publish a selection of papers. The results of the 2015 Whistler gathering are published in the Journal of Scholarly and Research Communication.
Other people offer services
Students who struggle with writing essays tend to be concerned with the way the composition affordable papers will become out.
for creative writing, while others offer a wide array of topics for various areas of the curriculum.